Greyhound corp v superior court

Author: rmnn

August undefined, 2024

WebThe named defendant on review was the Superior Court, since the case went to the Supreme Court on the issue of whether a writ of mandate should ... 143 Cal. Rptr. 710 (quoting Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court, 56 Cal. 2d 355, 382-83, 364 P.2d 266, 279, 15 Cal. Rptr. 90, 103 (1961) (emphasis in the original)). 16. 357 U.S. 449 (1958). 17. 20 ... WebTHE GREYHOUND CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF MERCED COUNTY, Respondent; EARLINE Z. CLAY et al., Real Parties in Interest, 56 Cal. 2d …

Boire v. Greyhound Corp., 376 U.S. 473 (1964) - Justia Law

WebMar 4, 2010 · In Greyhound, supra, 56 Cal.2d 355, the trial court granted the plaintiff's request for production of statements taken from independent, percipient witnesses to an accident that was the subject of the litigation. WebThe court held in Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal. 2d 355, 397, 15 Cal. Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266, that remarks made by defense investigators were not protected by the attorney-client privilege. Greyhound questioned Holm's ruling that photographs sent to counsel were protected by the attorney-client privilege, and determined that ... supply chain events 2022

THE GREYHOUND CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT …

WebFebruary 23, 1961. PROCEEDING in mandamus to compel the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and Philbrick McCoy, Judge thereof, to vacate its order denying petitioners' motion to require the real party in interest to answer certain interrogatories. Writ granted. Brock, Fleishman Rykoff for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondents. Web(E.g., Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal. 2d 355, 394 [15 Cal. Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266].) [4] In order to facilitate the ascertainment of truth and the just resolution … WebJul 19, 2024 · As the California Supreme Court explained: The discovery process is designed to “‘make a trial less a game of blindman’s bluff and more a fair contest with the basic issues and facts disclosed to the fullest practicable extent.'” Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal. 2d 355, 376. supply chain exchange

Are Your Objections Garbage? Resolving Discovery Disputes

Williams v. Superior Court of L.A. Cnty. - Casetext

WebJul 17, 2010 · The Court of Appeal granted a writ of mandate, based on Greyhound Corp. v. Sup. Ct. (1961) 56 Cal.2d 355. The California Supreme Court granted review and … Web2 The leading case is Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court, 56 Cal. 2d 355, 364 P.2d 266, 15 Cal. Rptr. 90 (1961). Since then the supreme court has considered the discovery provi-sions on numerous occasions and has consistently maintained a "liberal" viewpoint. See, supply chain events europe 2023WebDec 1, 1997 · ( Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal. 2d 355, 376, 15 Cal. Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266.) "Certainly, it can be said, that the Legislature intended to take the 'game' element out of trial preparation while yet retaining the adversary nature of … supply chain executive order

"WebOct 17, 2024 · Though broad, the trial court's discretion in discovery matters is not unlimited. (Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal.2d 355, 380 [15 Cal.Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266].) ‘[I]f there is no legal justification for such exercise of discretion it must be held that an abuse occurred.’ (Carlson v. " - Greyhound corp v superior court

Greyhound corp v superior court

WebOn March 15, 1965, the San Francisco Superior Court sustained Greyhound's demurrer without leave to amend. Said demurrer was sustained on the basis that the federal … WebIn Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court, supra, 56 Cal. 2d 355, 378, the court stated, "For the [237 Cal. App. 2d 757] guidance of trial courts the proper rule [of construction of the discovery statutes] is declared to be not only one of liberal interpretation, but one that also recognizes that disclosure is a matter of right unless statutory or ...

Did you know?

WebAug 26, 2024 · Virginia’s highest court has overturned a homeowners association’s lawsuit victory. The court ruled that the HOA overstepped in fining and suing a family for leaving … Web(c); Code Civ. Proc., section 2031, subd. (e).) (See generally Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal.2d 355, 377.) "The trial court is in the best position to weigh fairly the competing needs and interests of parties affected by discovery." (Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, supra, 467 U.S. at p. 36.) Secrecy Agreements and Protective ...

WebGREYHOUND CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of California IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF MERCED, Respondent; Earline Z. Clay et al., … WebGreyhound Corp. v. Superior Court of Merced County California Supreme Court 08-03-1961 www.anylaw.com Research the case of Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court of Merced County, from the California Supreme Court, 08-03-1961.

WebThe office provides legal services to the low-income and elderly citizens of Loudoun County, including assistance with problems such as custody, child support, debt … WebJoe successfully argued State v. S.S. before the Supreme Court, where the Court changed the standard of review in video-taped confession cases. ... District of Columbia Superior …

WebJun 25, 2012 · The majority, relying on Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 Cal.2d 355, 15 Cal.Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266 ( Greyhound ) and expressly declining to follow Nacht & Lewis, concluded that witness interviews and the information sought by form interrogatory No. 12.3 are not entitled as a matter of law to absolute or qualified work …

WebSuperior Court, 161 Cal.App.2d 644, 648 [ 327 P.2d 212 ]) and in the conviction that the restraint here announced will further the true purposes of the act. Petitioner, in argument and memoranda, seems to seek a direction to the trial court to permit inspection of the statement given by Files to defense counsel. supply chain executive jobsWebThe Beesley opinion points out that in the case of Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court, 56 Cal. 2d 355 [15 Cal. Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266], it was held that written statements of independent witnesses are subject to inspection when the need is shown. The court, in the Beesley opinion, at page 208, continues: "Here good cause was shown in the fact ... supply chain example companyWebJun 18, 2013 · Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court (1961) 56 C2d 355, 15 CR 90, interpreting the Discovery Act of 1957. The intention of the discovery statutes is to … supply chain exam questions and answersWebMay 13, 2003 · In light of their broad discretion in discovery matters (see generally Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court [, supra,] 56 Cal.2d 355, 15 Cal.Rptr. 90, 364 P.2d 266), trial courts retain the power to permit the presence of counsel or to take other prophylactic measures when needed.” (Vinson v. Superior Court, supra, at p. 846, 239 … supply chain eyewear industryWebIn Greyhound, the plaintiff in a personal injury suit arising from a car accident sought written statements that had been obtained from witnesses by the defendant's insurance … supply chain events ukWebU.S. Supreme Court. Boire v. Greyhound Corp., 376 U.S. 473 (1964) Boire v. Greyhound Corporation No. 77 Argued February 17, 1964 Decided March 23, 1964 376 U.S. 473 … supply chain executive search firmsWebGet Greyhound Corp. v. Superior Court, 364 P.2d 266 (1961), California Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by … supply chain expo 2022